Return to 2002 DP Start 
Return to Agenda for Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next Page

 

13 ADVANCED VOIR DIRE: SITTING ON THE ANALOGUE BY THE STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS The art of voir dire, no matter who the practitioner, is incapable of transforming personal attitudes and biases developed over lifetimes. Voir dire, however, is capable of exposing those attitudes and biases so that the lawyers and the trial judge are able to evaluate those preconceptions against the issues and personalities involved in a particular case. As significant, voir dire can reveal those individuals who are open-minded enough on certain matters that they can give a case a fair hearing. For voir dire to function effectively the questioner or interviewer must obtain honest and candid disclosures from the potential jurors. Voir dire inherently contains certain obstacles to candid and honest responses by the venirepersons. One factor that impedes open and honest communication is the "spotlight" syndrome. Regardless of whether a potential juror must answer in the privacy of sequestered, individual voir dire or in the public forum of group voir dire, he or she is "in the spotlight" as judge, prosecutor, defense lawyer, defense lawyer, court reporter, court personnel, fellow jurors, spectators and media representatives listen and record the venireperson's answers, opinions and ideas. Another impediment to frank and open juror responses is the artificiality of voir dire. As a result of the judicial orientation, potential jurors are aware to some degree of the facts and issues in the case as well as the roles played by the judge, prosecutor and defense counsel. In this context, venirepersons are likely to guess the "right' or "expected" answers. This is