15 cue from the relevant life-history information about the venireperson, contained on the jurorqualification form or revealed in earlier voir dire, and ties the legal or factual issue to ahypothetical question set in the context of the venireperson's life experiences.The questions could develop this way:You are the mother of two grown sons?I'm sure you have strong memories of raising your twosons?Think back to the time your younger son was nineyears old, what would you have done if you received acall from a neighbor who said she had been told thatyour son was seen throwing rocks and breaking windowsin the vacant house two streets away?What action will you take when your younger soncomes home?What if your neighbor says the person who saw therock-throwing incident does not want her name revealed?What if your son, went told of this accusation, deniesdoing it but refuses to talk with you about it?This is just one simple way to generate a reality-based, life experience discussion of thelegal concepts of the presumption of innocence and the right to remain silent without evermentioning those legal principles by name or legal label. When the potential juror responds,