Return to 2002 DP Start 
Return to Agenda for Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next Page

 
17 of a quality. This gives a more accurate reading of the event than simply asking: 'Give me an example.' Third, a superlative adjective is remarkably freeing on the respondent. It implies: 'Of course, you have had one of these. I (as the interviewer) expect you to have had an incident like this and, furthermore, do not think you are a jerk because you have had such an incident.'" Id. "The responses to these kinds of questions, especially when followed up with further behavior description questions, will also yield close approximations to what the person did, indeed, does in the given situation." Tom Janz, Behavior Description Interviewing (1986), p. 41. "It is almost as though the interviewer is watching the person perform in the workplace." Id. A AA AConsequently, asking behavior description questions is an excellent tool for cracking through the dynamics of situations in which the candidate is attempting to project an overly favorable impression." Id. Applying this approach to voir dire, the questioner attempts to elicit actual incidents in the potential juror's background that are comparable to the legal or factual issue to be discussed. For example, the questioner might ask the venireperson the following: As an employer, have you ever had to settle a dispute between two employees who have exactly opposite versions of what happened? How were you able to decide which employee was telling the truth? Why did you trust the customer witness? Would it have made a difference if the customer witness